- About Us
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Polygraph Instrument Manufacturers
- Scientific Basis for Polygraph
- Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA)
- APA Anti-trust Statement
- A physiology manual for PDD lifelong learners of the science
- Principles of Applied Psychophysiological Detection of Deception
- Meta-Analytic Survey of Criterion Accuracy of Validated Polygraph Techniques
- Polygraph citation list 1972-2013
- State Licensing Boards
- Contact Us
Appeals Court Affirms Sex Offender Testing
Click the image to view it full-size
U.S. v. TEEPLE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,v.RAYMOND FRANK TEEPLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Filed: January 12, 2012.
Before: SILER and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and TARNOW, District Judge.*
Raymond Frank Teeple appeals the district court's order modifying the conditions of his supervised release.
In 1999, Teeple pleaded guilty to engaging in a sexual act with a person under twelve years old, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c), and abusive sexual contact with a person under twelve years old, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(a)(1). The district court sentenced him to 121 months in prison, to be followed by five years of supervised release under certain conditions. In 2010, while Teeple was on supervised release, a probation officer requested that the district court add to the conditions of Teeple's supervised release that he participate in sex offender assessment and treatment, which may include physiological testing such as polygraph and ABEL assessment.1 After conducting a hearing on the issue, the district court amended the judgment of conviction to add the additional condition to Teeple's supervised release.
Please click here to view the opinion in its entirety.